Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for protein analyses under native conditions: Current progress and perspectives.

Native mass spectrometry is a rapidly emerging technique for fast and sensitive structural analysis of protein constructs, maintaining the protein higher order structure. The coupling with electromigration separation techniques under native conditions enables the characterization of proteoforms and highly complex protein mixtures. In this review, we present an overview of current native CE-MS technology. First, the status of native separation conditions is described for capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE), and capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF), as well as their chip-based formats, including essential parameters such as electrolyte composition and capillary coatings. Further, conditions required for native ESI-MS of (large) protein constructs, including instrumental parameters of QTOF and Orbitrap systems, as well as requirements for native CE-MS interfacing are presented. On this basis, methods and applications of the different modes of native CE-MS are summarized and discussed in the context of biological, medical, and biopharmaceutical questions. Finally, key achievements are highlighted and concluded, while remaining challenges are pointed out.

Ion mobility in gas and liquid phases: How much orthogonality is obtained in capillary electrophoresis-ion mobility-mass spectrometry?

Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) is an ever-evolving tool to separate ions in the gas phase according to electrophoretic mobility with subsequent mass determination. CE is rarely coupled to IM-MS, possibly due to similar separation mechanisms based on electrophoretic mobility. Here, we investigate the orthogonality of CE and ion mobility (IM) by analyzing a complex peptide mixture (tryptic digest of HeLa proteins) with trapped ion mobility mass spectrometry (TIMS-MS). Using the nanoCEasy interface, excellent sensitivity was achieved by identifying thousands of peptides and achieving a peak capacity of 7500 (CE: 203-323 in a 150 cm long capillary, IM: 27-31). Plotting CE versus mass and CE versus (inverse) mobility, a clear grouping in curved striped patterns is observed according to the charge-to-size and mass-to-charge ratios. The peptide charge in the acidic background electrolyte can be estimated from the number of basic amino acids, with a few exceptions where neighboring effects reduce the positive charge. A surprisingly high orthogonality of CE and IM is observed, which is obviously caused by solvation effects leading to different charges and sizes in the liquid phase compared to the gas phase. A high orthogonality of CE and ion mobility is expected to be observed for other peptide samples as well as other substance classes, making CE-IM-MS a promising tool for various applications.

Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.

In bilateral rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the second of two targets, T1 and T2, is better identified in the left visual field (LVF) than in the right visual field (RVF). This LVF advantage may reflect hemispheric asymmetry in temporal attention or/and in spatial orienting of attention. Participants performed two tasks: the "standard" bilateral RSVP task (Exp.1) and its unilateral variant (Exp.1 & 2). In the bilateral task, spatial location was uncertain, thus target identification involved stimulus-driven spatial orienting. In the unilateral task, the targets were presented block-wise in the LVF or RVF only, such that no spatial orienting was needed for target identification. Temporal attention was manipulated in both tasks by varying the T1-T2 lag. The results showed that the LVF advantage disappeared when involvement of stimulus-driven spatial orienting was eliminated, whereas the manipulation of temporal attention had no effect on the asymmetry. In conclusion, the results do not support the hypothesis of hemispheric asymmetry in temporal attention, and provide further evidence that the LVF advantage reflects right hemisphere predominance in stimulus-driven orienting of spatial attention. These conclusions fit evidence that temporal attention is implemented by bilateral parietal areas and spatial attention by the right-lateralized ventral frontoparietal network.

A right hemisphere advantage at early cortical stages of processing alphanumeric stimuli. Evidence from electrophysiology.

This study investigates hemispheric asymmetry evoked by non-target alphanumeric stimuli in a bilateral rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. Our indicators of asymmetry are shorter latencies and larger amplitudes of the right hemisphere (RH) P1 and N1 components of visual evoked potentials (VEPs). This VEP asymmetry might reflect either a RH advantage, possibly in early perceptual processing, or for familiar stimuli, or for directing attention, or might be a paradoxical reflection of left hemisphere specialization in letter processing. Experiment 1 showed that the VEP asymmetry decreased, though remained present, with unfamiliar stimuli (Tibetan letters), as compared to familiar stimuli (Latin letters and Arabic digits). Experiment 2 showed that while leftward and rightward attentional biases affected the relation between hemispheres contra- and ipsilateral to attended visual fields, the VEP asymmetry remained independent of attention. As the most parsimonious explanation, the primary cause of the VEP asymmetry seems to be a general predominance of the RH in early perceptual processing.